Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Thomas v. State

Thomas v. State

15 S.E. 537, 89 Ga. 479
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 4, 1892
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 15 S.E. 537 (Thomas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomas v. State, 15 S.E. 537, 89 Ga. 479 (Ga. 1892).

Opinion

[480]*480 Judgment affirmed.

3. Other witnesses could have been obtained, as he is informed and believes since the trial, whose names he does not now know and whom he is advised and believes he can have present in the event a new trial is granted. No affidavits appear to have accompanied the motion. The bill of exceptions states that the counsel for the defendant announced ready. Pre.ston & Giles, for plaintiff in error. W. A. Little, attorney-general, and H. G. Lewis, solicitor-general, by Hines, Shubricic & Felder, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McLendon v. State
52 S.E.2d 294 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1949)
Lamar v. State
33 S.E.2d 263 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1945)
Wheat v. State
1 S.E.2d 1 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Morrow v. State
148 S.E. 500 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1929)
Lucas v. State
91 S.E. 72 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1916)
Thomas v. State
59 S.E. 246 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)
Cohen v. State
42 S.E. 781 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
Taylor v. State
31 S.E. 764 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 S.E. 537, 89 Ga. 479, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-state-ga-1892.