Thomas v. State

158 So. 502, 118 Fla. 1, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1676
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJanuary 8, 1935
StatusPublished

This text of 158 So. 502 (Thomas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomas v. State, 158 So. 502, 118 Fla. 1, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1676 (Fla. 1935).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this case the plaintiff was convicted of the crime of assault with intent to commit rape.

' After a full and fair consideration of the evidence as shown by the record here the majority of this Court are of the opinion that justice demands a reversal of the judgment because the evidence upon which the State relied for conviction is so unsubstantial and unsatisfactory as to have left the jury to grope in the realm of guess work and speculation to return a verdict against the defendant, and, therefore, on authority of the opinions and judgments in the cases of McNeil v. State, 104 Fla. 360, 139 Sou. 791, and Smith v. State, 101 Fla. 1066, 132 Sou. 840, and cases there *2 cited, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for new trial.

So ordered.

Whitfield, C. J., and Ellis, Terrell, Brown, Buford, and Davis, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McNeil v. State
139 So. 791 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1932)
Smith v. State
132 So. 840 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
158 So. 502, 118 Fla. 1, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-state-fla-1935.