Thomas v. State

977 A.2d 899, 2009 WL 2142496
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Thomas v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Del. LEXIS 597
Supreme Court of Delaware·Decided July 20, 2009·No. 38, 2009·Published

Opinion

ANDRE R. THOMAS, Defendant Below-Appellant,
v.
STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff Below-Appellee.

No. 38, 2009.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

Submitted: June 12, 2009.
Decided: July 20, 2009.

Before STEELE, Chief Justice, JACOBS, and RIDGELY, Justices.

ORDER

HENRY duPONT RIDGELY, Justice.

This 20th day of July 2009, after careful consideration of the parties' briefs and the record on appeal, we find it manifest that the judgment below should be affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court=s well-reasoned decision dated January 12, 2009. The Superior Court did not err in concluding that appellant's second motion for postconviction relief was untimely and otherwise barred and that appellant failed to overcome the procedural hurdles.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomas v. State, 977 A.2d 899, 2009 WL 2142496 (Del. 2009).

977 A.2d 899 (Thomas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.