Thomas v. State

418 S.W.2d 792, 243 Ark. 147, 1967 Ark. LEXIS 1081
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided October 2, 1967·No. 5266 through 5273·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Conley Byrd, Justice.

The appellants, Thorp Thomas, Chester Boyer, Leon Brents, Charles F. Wells, Everett Hamm Jr., and Gene Wirges, bring their separate appeals, consolidated here, challenging the authority of the trial court to assess court costs against them upon dismissal of criminal charges against them.

Except for the insertion of the individual names of appellants, the orders entered by the trial court read, ‘ ‘... it is by the Court . . . ordered . . .that the indictment against the said Thorp Thomas be dismissed and that Thorp Thomas be discharged, upon payment of costs.”

The order assessing court costs against the defendant upon dismissal of the indictment is void and of no effect, Melton v. State, (Ala. Ct. of App.) 1 So. 2d 920 (1941), and is a violation of due process of law, Giaccio v. Pennsylvania, 382 U. S. 399 (1966). Nor was any objection necessary since the court exceeded its authority, Sibley v. Leek, 45 Ark. 346 (1885).

Reversed and dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomas v. State, 418 S.W.2d 792, 243 Ark. 147, 1967 Ark. LEXIS 1081 (Ark. 1967).

418 S.W.2d 792 (Thomas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State of Iowa v. Ronald Richard Pagliai
Supreme Court of Iowa, 2026
Eric Gillette v. City of Fort Smith, Arkansas
2023 Ark. 24 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2023)
McKinney v. City of El Dorado
824 S.W.2d 826 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1992)
Parker v. Laws
460 S.W.2d 337 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1970)
State v. Lawrence
439 S.W.2d 819 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1969)