Thomas v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Thomas v. State

200 So. 575, 30 Ala. App. 56, 1941 Ala. App. LEXIS 26

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Thomas v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 31 Ala. App. 1 →

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided February 18, 1941·No. 4 Div. 636.·Published

Opinion

SIMPSON, Judge.

This appeal proceeded from a judgment of conviction below of arson in the second degree. The record' proper is in all respects regular, and it appears that the few. exceptions reserved upon trial were without merit. The oral charge of the court was ample, clear and correct. The evidence abundantly supported the verdict of' guilty. Nothing else need be said. The. judgment must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SIMPSON, Judge.

This appeal proceeded from a judgment of conviction below of arson in the second degree. The record' proper is in all respects regular, and it appears that the few. exceptions reserved upon trial were without merit. The oral charge of the court was ample, clear and correct. The evidence abundantly supported the verdict of' guilty. Nothing else need be said. The. judgment must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Thomas v. State, 200 So. 575, 30 Ala. App. 56, 1941 Ala. App. LEXIS 26 (Ala. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

200 So. 575 (Thomas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.