Thomas v. State

129 So. 308, 23 Ala. App. 550, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 158
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Thomas v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 23 Ala. App. 438
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided June 17, 1930·No. 8 Div. 897.·Published

Opinion

RICE, J.

Appellant was convicted of the offense denounced by Code 1923, § 4158 — “Giving check or draft when funds insufficient to cover.”

The single count of the indictment, under which he was convicted, alleged that he “with intent to defraud did make or utter a cheek upon the Tennessee Valley Bank of Sheffield, Alabama, knowing at the time,” etc. (Italics ours.)

We.have searched the bill of exceptions diligently, but fail to find any evidence tending to support the allegation which we have italicised above. This was an essential averment, and, in the absence of any proof tending to show its truth, appellant was due to have given at his request the general affirmative charge in his favor. For the error in its refusal, the judgment of conviction must be reversed, and the cause remanded. May v. State, 22 Ala. App. 278, 114 So. 788.

The other questions apparent are simple, and may not arise on another trial. They will not be here treated.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomas v. State, 129 So. 308, 23 Ala. App. 550, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 158 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

129 So. 308 (Thomas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

May v. State
114 So. 788 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1927)