Thomas v. State

622 So. 2d 420, 1993 Ala. LEXIS 579, 1993 WL 196242
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided June 11, 1993·No. 1911218·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

ADAMS, Justice.

In quashing the petition for writ of cer-tiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Criminal Appeals’ opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT QUASHED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and ALMON, SHORES and STEAGALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomas v. State, 622 So. 2d 420, 1993 Ala. LEXIS 579, 1993 WL 196242 (Ala. 1993).

622 So. 2d 420 (Thomas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bartlett v. State
701 So. 2d 305 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1997)
Click v. State
695 So. 2d 209 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1996)
Tomlin v. State
695 So. 2d 157 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1996)
Myers v. State
677 So. 2d 807 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1995)
Bishop v. Bishop
330 So. 2d 443 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1976)