Thomas v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC

433 P.3d 818, 192 Wash. 2d 1018
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 6, 2019
DocketNo. 96430-1
StatusPublished

This text of 433 P.3d 818 (Thomas v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomas v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC, 433 P.3d 818, 192 Wash. 2d 1018 (Wash. 2019).

Opinion

¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Johnson, Owens, Wiggins and Gordon McCloud, considered at its February 5, 2019, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the petition for review is denied. The Respondents' request for attorney fees for filing an answer to the petition for review is granted. The Respondents are awarded reasonable attorney fees and expenses pursuant to RAP 18.1(j). The amount of the attorney fees and expenses will be determined by the Supreme Court Clerk pursuant to RAP 18.1. Pursuant to RAP 18.1(d), the Respondents should file an affidavit with the Clerk of the Washington State Supreme Court.

For the Court/s/ Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
433 P.3d 818, 192 Wash. 2d 1018, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-specialized-loan-servicing-llc-wash-2019.