Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Thomas v. Southeast Bank NA

Thomas v. Southeast Bank NA

462 So. 2d 1214, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 378, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14110
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 8, 1985
DocketNo. 84-2271
StatusPublished

This text of 462 So. 2d 1214 (Thomas v. Southeast Bank NA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomas v. Southeast Bank NA, 462 So. 2d 1214, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 378, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14110 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s order granting a temporary injunction is affirmed. See Oxford Int’l Bank and Trust, Ltd. v. Merrill Lynch, etc., 374 So.2d 54 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. dismissed, 383 So.2d 1199 (Fla.1980). However, the bond posted by appel-lee does not appear to fulfill the requirements of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610(c). Therefore, we remand with instructions that unless a proper bond is posted within a short time to be fixed by the trial court, the injunction should be dissolved.

Affirmed and remanded for proceedings consistent herewith.

RYDER, C.J., and OTT and LEHAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Oxford Intern. Bank & Trust, Ltd. v. Merrill Lynch, Etc.
374 So. 2d 54 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
462 So. 2d 1214, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 378, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-southeast-bank-na-fladistctapp-1985.