Thomas v. South Side Elevated Railway Co.

214 U.S. 496, 29 S. Ct. 698, 53 L. Ed. 1059, 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1934
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 26, 1909·No. No. 157·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Writ of error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Stevens, Administrator, v. Nichols, 157 U. S. 370; Loeber v. Schroeder, 149 U. S. 580; Central Land Co. v. Laidley, 159 U. S. 103; Backus v. Fort Street Union Depot Co., 169 U. S. 557; Ballard v. Hunter, 204 U. S. 241; Tracy v. Ginsberg, 205 U. S. 180; Rusch v. John Duncan Land & Mining Co., 211 U. S. 526; reported below, 218 Illinois, 571.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomas v. South Side Elevated Railway Co., 214 U.S. 496, 29 S. Ct. 698, 53 L. Ed. 1059, 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1934 (1909).

214 U.S. 496 (Thomas v. South Side Elevated Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Prosser v. Seaboard Air Line R. Co.
56 S.E.2d 591 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1949)