Thomas v. Sotera Defense Solution, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Thomas v. Sotera Defense Solution, Inc.

676 F. App'x 199

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 14, 2017·No. No. 16-1860·Published

Opinion

Affirmed in part; affirmed in part as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dione M. Thomas appeals the district court’s orders granting defendants’ motions to dismiss her second amended complaint in this employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the dismissal of count I for the reasons stated by the district court. We likewise affirm the dismissal of count II, but as modified to reflect dismissal of that count without prejudice. Thomas v. Sotera Defense Solutions, Inc., No. 1:15-cv-00596-CMH-MSN (E.D. Va. filed July 19, 2016 & entered July 20, 2016; July 27, 2016). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED IN PART; AFFIRMED IN PART AS MODIFIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed in part; affirmed in part as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dione M. Thomas appeals the district court’s orders granting defendants’ motions to dismiss her second amended complaint in this employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the dismissal of count I for the reasons stated by the district court. We likewise affirm the dismissal of count II, but as modified to reflect dismissal of that count without prejudice. Thomas v. Sotera Defense Solutions, Inc., No. 1:15-cv-00596-CMH-MSN (E.D. Va. filed July 19, 2016 & entered July 20, 2016; July 27, 2016). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED IN PART; AFFIRMED IN PART AS MODIFIED

Thomas v. Sotera Defense Solution, Inc., 676 F. App'x 199 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

676 F. App'x 199 (Thomas v. Sotera Defense Solution, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.