Thomas v. Soper

5 Munf. 28, 19 Va. 28, 1816 Va. LEXIS 8
Supreme Court of Virginia·Decided February 6, 1816·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

1. Although, Sutbe case of an absolute deed of slaves, where the grantor remains in possession after the execution and recording of the same, such deed is to be regarded as fraudulent and void as to creditors and subsequent purchasers, yet the same is obligatory, and cannot be impeached, as between the grantor and grantee and their representatives. «?*See Alexander v, Deneale, 2 Munf. 34! ; Gay v. Moseley, ibid. 543. — ñobertsonv* Ewell, 3 Munf. 1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomas v. Soper, 5 Munf. 28, 19 Va. 28, 1816 Va. LEXIS 8 (Va. 1816).

5 Munf. 28 (Thomas v. Soper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Holliday v. McKinne
22 Fla. 153 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1886)
Howard v. Prince
12 F. Cas. 650 (E.D. Virginia, 1874)
Cochran v. Paris
11 Gratt. 348 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1854)
Davis v. Turner
4 Va. 422 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1848)
Spalding v. Grigg
4 Ga. 75 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1848)
Sydnor v. Gee
4 Va. 535 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1833)
Claytor v. Anthony
27 Va. 285 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1828)