Thomas v. Smith

961 So. 2d 1056, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 11364, 2007 WL 2089362
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Thomas v. Smith. Read the opinion of the Court — 882 So. 2d 1037
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 24, 2007·No. No. 1D07-2070·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of May 7, 2007, the Court has determined that the appeal is untimely. Although the lower tribunal granted the appellant’s motion for extension of time within which to file the motion for rehearing, it was without authority to do so. Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.090(b). Consequently, the appellant’s untimely motion for rehearing failed to delay rendition of the underlying order pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.020(h). As a result, the notice of appeal, which was filed more than 30 days after rendition of the final judgment, failed to timely invoke the Court’s jurisdiction. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

BARFIELD, KAHN, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomas v. Smith, 961 So. 2d 1056, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 11364, 2007 WL 2089362 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

961 So. 2d 1056 (Thomas v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.