Thomas v. Slaton
This text of 2018 NY Slip Op 392 (Thomas v. Slaton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| Thomas v Slaton |
| 2018 NY Slip Op 00392 |
| Decided on January 23, 2018 |
| Appellate Division, First Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on January 23, 2018
Sweeny, J.P., Richter, Andrias, Webber, Oing, JJ.
5506 157528/12
v
Denise Slaton, et al., Defendants-Respondents.
Busson & Sikorski, P.C., New York (Robert S. Sikorski of counsel), for appellants.
Schwartzman Garelik Walker & Troy, P.C., New York (Donald A. Pitofsky of counsel), for respondents.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shlomo S. Hagler, J.), entered August 22, 2017, which, to the extent appealed from, in this action for adverse possession, denied plaintiffs' cross motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Triable issues of fact exist as to whether plaintiffs' possession of the subject property was hostile and exclusive for
the statutory period of 10 years (see generally Brand v Prince , 35 NY2d 634, 636 [1974]).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: JANUARY 23, 2018
CLERK
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2018 NY Slip Op 392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-slaton-nyappdiv-2018.