Thomas v. Sheppard-Notter Co.

163 So. 524, 121 Fla. 191, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1540
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedOctober 11, 1935
StatusPublished

This text of 163 So. 524 (Thomas v. Sheppard-Notter Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomas v. Sheppard-Notter Co., 163 So. 524, 121 Fla. 191, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1540 (Fla. 1935).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appeal brings for review order overruling motion to dismiss bill of complaint, the purpose of which was to foreclose on an alleged mortgage indebtedness.

While a motion for compulsory amendment and for bill of particulars' might have been warranted by reason of some indefiniteness in the allegation of the bill, it appears that the bill of complaint is not entirely without equity and, therefore, the order of the Chancellor must be affirmed.

It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Terrell, Brown, Buford, and Davis, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
163 So. 524, 121 Fla. 191, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1540, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-sheppard-notter-co-fla-1935.