Thomas v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided June 15, 2020·No. 18-1733·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 18-1733V UNPUBLISHED

KAREN THOMAS, Chief Special Master Corcoran

Petitioner, Filed: May 13, 2020 v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Special Processing Unit (SPU); Joint HUMAN SERVICES, Stipulation on Damages; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Respondent. Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA)

Jimmy A. Zgheib, Zgheib Sayad, P.C., White Plains, NY, for petitioner.

Jennifer Leigh Reynaud, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION 1

On November 8, 2018, Karen Thomas filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq., 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA) as a result of her October 13, 2017 influneza (“flu”) vaccination. Petition at 1; Stipulation, filed May 12, 2020, at ¶¶ 2, 4. Petitioner further alleges that the vaccine was administered within the United States, that she suffered the residual effects of her injury for more than six months, and that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action on her behalf as a result of her injury. Stipulation at ¶¶ 3-5; see Petition at ¶¶4, 27-29. “Respondent denies that petitioner sustained a SIRVA Table injury; denies that the vaccine caused petitioner’s alleged shoulder injury, or any other injury; and denies that her current condition is a sequelae of a vaccine- related injury.” Stipulation at ¶ 6.

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Nevertheless, on May 12, 2020, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation, stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. I find the stipulation reasonable and adopt it as my decision awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, I award the following compensation:

A lump sum of $45,000.00 in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages that would be available under § 15(a). Id.

I approve the requested amount for Petitioner’s compensation. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.

2 ·- ,.·

IN THE lJNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

KAREN THOMAS,

Petitioner, No. I 8-l 733V Chier Special Master C\)rcoran V. ECF

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

1. Karen Thomas ("petitioner"), filed a petition for vac.cinc compensation under the

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. 42 U.S.C. § J00aa-10 to 34 (the "Vaccine

Program"). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to petitioner·s receipt

of an influenza ("flu·') vaccine, which vaccine is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the

'·Table"), 42 C.F.R. § 100.3(a)

2. Petitioner received a flu vaccine on Octoher 13, 2017.

3. The vaccine was administered within the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that she sustained a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration

(''SIRVA") within the time period set forth in the Table, or in the alternative, that her alleged

shoulder injury was caused by the vaccine. She further alleges that she experienced the residual

effects of this condition for more than six months. 5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action

for damages on her behalf as a result of her alleged injury.

6. Respondent denies that petitioner sustained a SIRVA Table injury; denies that the

vaccine caused petitioner's alleged shoulder injury, or any other injury: and denies that her

current condition is a scquelae of a vaccine-related injury.

7. Maintaining their above-stated positions. the parties neve1thcless now agree that the

issues between them shall be ~ettled and that a decision should be entered awarding the

compe-nsation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment rellecting a decision consistent with

the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has liled an election to receive compensation

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2l(a)(l), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue

the following vaccine compensation payment;

A lump sum of $45,000.00 in the form of a chec.k payable to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l 5(a).

9. As soon as practicable after th<: entry of judgment on entitlement in this case, anJ after

petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 300aa-2l(a)(l), and an application, the patties will submit to further proceedings before

the special master to award reasonable attorneys· fee~ and costs incurred in proceeding upon this

petition.

I 0. Petitioner and her attorney represent that compensation to be provided pursuant to

this Stipulation is not for any items or services for which the Program is not primarily liable

under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(g). to the extent that payment has been made or can reasonably be

2 expected to be made under any State compensation programs, insurance policies, Federal or

State health benefits programs (other than Title XIX of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.

§ 1396 ct seq.)), or by entities that provide health sc.·rvices on a pre-paid basis.

11. Payment made pursuant to paragraph 8 anJ any amounts awarded pursuant to

paragraph 9 of this Stipulation will be made in accordance with 42 U.S .C.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomas v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2020).

Thomas v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Thomas v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(i)
§ 300aa-2l
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2l(a)(l)
§ 300aa-l
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l
§ 3P0aa-l
42 U.S.C. § 3P0aa-l
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a
§ 3P
42 U.S.C. § 3P