Thomas v. Scott

99 S.E. 57, 23 Ga. App. 652, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 261
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 19, 1919
Docket10249
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 99 S.E. 57 (Thomas v. Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomas v. Scott, 99 S.E. 57, 23 Ga. App. 652, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 261 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. Permissive use of a private way not over fifteen feet in .vidth may ripen into prescriptive rights thereto. See Kirkland v. Pittman, 122 Ga. 256, 259 (50 S. E. 117) and cases cited.

2. The evidence in this ease was conflicting, but the ordinary who heard the case was authorized to render judgment requiring removal of obstructions from the private way. Eor no reason assigned did the judge of the superior court err in the judgment overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, C. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carter v. Kinman
209 S.E.2d 230 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)
King v. Dickerson
11 S.E.2d 838 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1940)
Carter v. Dickerson
11 S.E.2d 414 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 S.E. 57, 23 Ga. App. 652, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-scott-gactapp-1919.