Thomas v. Scott
This text of 99 S.E. 57 (Thomas v. Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Permissive use of a private way not over fifteen feet in .vidth may ripen into prescriptive rights thereto. See Kirkland v. Pittman, 122 Ga. 256, 259 (50 S. E. 117) and cases cited.
2. The evidence in this ease was conflicting, but the ordinary who heard the case was authorized to render judgment requiring removal of obstructions from the private way. Eor no reason assigned did the judge of the superior court err in the judgment overruling the certiorari.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
99 S.E. 57, 23 Ga. App. 652, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-scott-gactapp-1919.