Thomas v. Scott

99 S.E. 57, 23 Ga. App. 652, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 261
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 19, 1919·No. 10249·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. Permissive use of a private way not over fifteen feet in .vidth may ripen into prescriptive rights thereto. See Kirkland v. Pittman, 122 Ga. 256, 259 (50 S. E. 117) and cases cited.

2. The evidence in this ease was conflicting, but the ordinary who heard the case was authorized to render judgment requiring removal of obstructions from the private way. Eor no reason assigned did the judge of the superior court err in the judgment overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, C. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomas v. Scott, 99 S.E. 57, 23 Ga. App. 652, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 261 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

99 S.E. 57 (Thomas v. Scott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carter v. Kinman
209 S.E.2d 230 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)
King v. Dickerson
11 S.E.2d 838 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1940)
Carter v. Dickerson
11 S.E.2d 414 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1940)