Thomas v. Schwarz

Third Circuit

Thomas v. Schwarz

140 F. 989, 71 C.C.A. 401, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 3647

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided January 15, 1906·No. No. 39·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

GRAY, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (140 Fed. 302), affirming the decision of the Board of General Appraisers, as to the classification of certain merchandise for customs duty, entered at the port of Philadelphia. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinon of the learned judge of the court below. As we agree with the conclusions of law arrived at, and the reasons in support thereof, as set forth in that opinion, we adopt the same as our own. The decree of the court below is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GRAY, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (140 Fed. 302), affirming the decision of the Board of General Appraisers, as to the classification of certain merchandise for customs duty, entered at the port of Philadelphia. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinon of the learned judge of the court below. As we agree with the conclusions of law arrived at, and the reasons in support thereof, as set forth in that opinion, we adopt the same as our own. The decree of the court below is affirmed.

Thomas v. Schwarz, 140 F. 989, 71 C.C.A. 401, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 3647 (3d Cir. 1906).

Pincite

140 F. 989 (Thomas v. Schwarz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related