Thomas v. Schwarz

140 F. 989, 71 C.C.A. 401, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 3647
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedJanuary 15, 1906
DocketNo. 39
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 140 F. 989 (Thomas v. Schwarz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomas v. Schwarz, 140 F. 989, 71 C.C.A. 401, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 3647 (3d Cir. 1906).

Opinion

GRAY, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (140 Fed. 302), affirming the decision of the Board of General Appraisers, as to the classification of certain merchandise for customs duty, entered at the port of Philadelphia. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinon of the learned judge of the court below. As we agree with the conclusions of law arrived at, and the reasons in support thereof, as set forth in that opinion, we adopt the same as our own. The decree of the court below is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Drakenfeld & Co. v. United States
9 Ct. Cust. 124 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1919)
Loewenthal v. United States
6 Ct. Cust. 209 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1915)
Knauth v. United States
4 Ct. Cust. 58 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
140 F. 989, 71 C.C.A. 401, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 3647, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-schwarz-ca3-1906.