Thomas v. Saratoga Ass'n for Improvement of Breed of Horses
170 N.E. 131, 252 N.Y. 529, 1929 N.Y. LEXIS 596
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thomas v. Saratoga Ass'n for Improvement of Breed of Horses, 170 N.E. 131, 252 N.Y. 529, 1929 N.Y. LEXIS 596 (N.Y. 1929).
170 N.E. 131 (Thomas v. Saratoga Ass'n for Improvement of Breed of Horses) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Morris v. Cleveland Hockey Club, Inc.
157 Ohio St. (N.S.) 225 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1952)