Thomas v. Richey

1935 OK 224, 42 P.2d 489, 171 Okla. 349, 1935 Okla. LEXIS 209
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedMarch 5, 1935
DocketNo. 26024.
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 1935 OK 224 (Thomas v. Richey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomas v. Richey, 1935 OK 224, 42 P.2d 489, 171 Okla. 349, 1935 Okla. LEXIS 209 (Okla. 1935).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On the 15th day of November, 1933, the court entered its order confirming the sale of property involved in this action, said property having been sold to satisfy a judgment in foreclosure. Subsequent to the issuance of the order confirming the sale, sheriff’s deed was issued and a writ of assistance was issued on the 25th day of November, 1933. On the 18th day of July, 1934, the defendant moved to vacate and set aside the judgment and order confirming sale.

On the 30th day of August, 1934, the court overruled the motion to vacate the judgment and order confirming sale. No notice of appeal was given at this time or within 10 days thereafter. In the case of Smith v. Morris, 166 Okla. 285, 27 P. (2d) 631, this court held:

“Section 531, O. S. 1931, is mandatory, and, among other things, provides that ‘the party desiring to appeal shall give notice in open court, either at the time the judgment is rendered, or within ten days there *350 after, of his intentions to appeal to the Supreme Court,’ and an attempted appeal not in conformity with the provisions of the statute will be dismissed.”

After the filing of the appeal in this court, a restraining order of January 9, 1934, was issued and- on the 11th day of January thereafter, continued pending the hearing on appeal. The restraining order and the continuance thereof is hereby dissolved and the appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dixon v. Rogers
1954 OK 333 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1954)
Tulsa Masonic Bldg. Ass'n v. County Treasurer
1951 OK 255 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1951)
Goodkin v. Hough
1942 OK 350 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1942)
Fishencord v. Peterson
1938 OK 192 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1935 OK 224, 42 P.2d 489, 171 Okla. 349, 1935 Okla. LEXIS 209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-richey-okla-1935.