Thomas v. Relfe

9 Mo. 373
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedJuly 15, 1845
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 9 Mo. 373 (Thomas v. Relfe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomas v. Relfe, 9 Mo. 373 (Mo. 1845).

Opinion

Scott, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Moses and Reuben Thomas executed their joint note to James H. Relfe, administrator of the estate of M. T. Hunter, deceased, and in an action on that, set up the defence that the letters of administration granted to the said Relfe on the estate of the said Hunter, had been revoked: The question is, whether such a defence is admissible.

[374]*374The point in this cause was involved and considerably discussed in the case of Lecompte vs. Sargeant, 7 Mo. R. 351. This court then held that notes of the character of those on which this suit is brought, were the individual property of him to whom they were payable, and that the term administrator on their face was a mere descriptio persona;. It is obvious that no proferí of letters of administration would be required in a declaration on a note of this character. How then can the repeal of the letters of administration affect the right of Relfe to this note ?

So, in the civil law, an administrator can novate the debt of his in- - testate, and make it his own. Turnbull vs. Freret, 5 Martin’s Lou. Rep. 703.

The other Judges concurring, the judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brooks v. Mastin
69 Mo. 58 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1878)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 Mo. 373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-relfe-mo-1845.