Thomas v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc.
This text of 578 So. 2d 64 (Thomas v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We reverse the trial court’s final summary judgment given issues of material fact exist concerning whether the product applied to appellee's floor created a dangerous condition causing appellant’s fall. We also note that the trial court unreasonably restricted appellant’s discovery to only the store in question when the record reflects appellee used the same floor product in its other stores. See Lawrence v. Florida East Coast Railway Co., 346 So.2d 1012 (Fla.1977); Saunders v. Florida Keys Electric Co-op Ass’n., Inc., 471 So.2d 88 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), rev. denied, 482 So.2d 348 (Fla.1986).
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
578 So. 2d 64, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3649, 1991 WL 61758, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-publix-supermarkets-inc-fladistctapp-1991.