Thomas v. Pippin
This text of Thomas v. Pippin (Thomas v. Pippin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
C. DOUGLASS THOMAS, ALAN E. THOMAS, Appellants
v.
JACK D. PIPPIN, Appellee ______________________
2015-1575, 2015-1577, 2015-1578, 2015-1579 ______________________
Appeals from the United States Patent and Trade- mark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. 105,956, 105,957, 105,958, 105,959. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
C. DOUGLASS THOMAS, IPVenture, Los Altos, CA, ar- gued for appellants.
MARK CHRISTOPHER FLEMING, Wilmer Cutler Picker- ing Hale and Dorr LLP, Boston, MA, argued for appellee. Also represented by WILLIAM F. LEE, ERIC FLETCHER; BRITTANY BLUEITT AMADI, WILLIAM G. MCELWAIN, Wash- ington, DC; WILLIAM N. HUGHET, ROBERT DANNY HUNTINGTON, Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C., Washington, DC. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, MOORE and TARANTO, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
January 15, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Thomas v. Pippin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-pippin-cafc-2016.