Thomas v. Pippin

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedOctober 15, 2013
Docket13-1142
StatusUnpublished

This text of Thomas v. Pippin (Thomas v. Pippin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomas v. Pippin, (Fed. Cir. 2013).

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

C. DOUGLASS THOMAS AND ALAN E. THOMAS, Appellants,

v.

JACK D. PIPPIN, Appellee. ______________________

2013-1142, -1143, -1144 ______________________

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trade- mark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Interfer- ence No. 105,801, 105, 802, 105, 803. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

C. DOUGLASS THOMAS, IpVenture, Inc., of Los Altos, California, argued for appellants.

WILLIAM F. LEE, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr, LLP, of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were MARK C. FLEMING, DONALD R. STEINBERG and ERIC FLETCHER; and WILLIAM G. MCELWAIN and CAROLYN JACOBS CHACHKIN, of Washing- ton, DC. Of counsel were R. DANNY HUNTINGTON and WILLIAM N. HIGHET, Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C., of Washington, DC. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, PLAGER, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

October 15, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Thomas v. Pippin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-pippin-cafc-2013.