Thomas v. Pippin
This text of Thomas v. Pippin (Thomas v. Pippin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
C. DOUGLASS THOMAS AND ALAN E. THOMAS, Appellants,
v.
JACK D. PIPPIN, Appellee. ______________________
2013-1142, -1143, -1144 ______________________
Appeals from the United States Patent and Trade- mark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Interfer- ence No. 105,801, 105, 802, 105, 803. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
C. DOUGLASS THOMAS, IpVenture, Inc., of Los Altos, California, argued for appellants.
WILLIAM F. LEE, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr, LLP, of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were MARK C. FLEMING, DONALD R. STEINBERG and ERIC FLETCHER; and WILLIAM G. MCELWAIN and CAROLYN JACOBS CHACHKIN, of Washing- ton, DC. Of counsel were R. DANNY HUNTINGTON and WILLIAM N. HIGHET, Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C., of Washington, DC. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (PROST, PLAGER, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
October 15, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Thomas v. Pippin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-pippin-cafc-2013.