Thomas v. Pauyo
This text of 203 A.D.2d 450 (Thomas v. Pauyo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Durante, J.), dated June 4, 1992, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion to permit expedient service of the summons and complaint on the defendant’s insurance company.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiffs’ submissions demonstrated that service upon the defendant pursuant to CPLR 308 (1), (2), or (4) would be impracticable in this case (see, Dobkin v Chapman, 21 NY2d 490; Esposito v Ruggerio, 193 AD2d 713). Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Miller and Hart, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
203 A.D.2d 450, 610 N.Y.S.2d 877, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4006, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-pauyo-nyappdiv-1994.