Thomas v. O'Rourke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Thomas v. O'Rourke

89 A.D.3d 1096, 933 N.Y.2d 594

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 29, 2011·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[1097] The record contains substantial evidence to support the respondents’ determination terminating the petitioner’s participation in the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program (see 24 CFR 982.552 [b] [2] [2010]; Matter of Friend v Mulligan, 16 AD3d 685, 686 [2005]; Matter of Douglas v Lannert, 272 AD2d 327 [2000]). In addition, the notice of termination adequately apprised the petitioner of the violations upon which the termination of her benefits from the program was based (see Matter of Block v Ambach, 73 NY2d 323, 333 [1989]; Matter of Friend v Mulligan, 16 AD3d at 686).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Dillon, J.P, Angiolillo, Florio and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[1097] The record contains substantial evidence to support the respondents’ determination terminating the petitioner’s participation in the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program (see 24 CFR 982.552 [b] [2] [2010]; Matter of Friend v Mulligan, 16 AD3d 685, 686 [2005]; Matter of Douglas v Lannert, 272 AD2d 327 [2000]). In addition, the notice of termination adequately apprised the petitioner of the violations upon which the termination of her benefits from the program was based (see Matter of Block v Ambach, 73 NY2d 323, 333 [1989]; Matter of Friend v Mulligan, 16 AD3d at 686).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Dillon, J.P, Angiolillo, Florio and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

Thomas v. O'Rourke, 89 A.D.3d 1096, 933 N.Y.2d 594 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

89 A.D.3d 1096 (Thomas v. O'Rourke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related