Thomas v. O'Rourke
This text of 89 A.D.3d 1096 (Thomas v. O'Rourke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[1097]*1097The record contains substantial evidence to support the respondents’ determination terminating the petitioner’s participation in the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program (see 24 CFR 982.552 [b] [2] [2010]; Matter of Friend v Mulligan, 16 AD3d 685, 686 [2005]; Matter of Douglas v Lannert, 272 AD2d 327 [2000]). In addition, the notice of termination adequately apprised the petitioner of the violations upon which the termination of her benefits from the program was based (see Matter of Block v Ambach, 73 NY2d 323, 333 [1989]; Matter of Friend v Mulligan, 16 AD3d at 686).
The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Dillon, J.P, Angiolillo, Florio and Dickerson, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
89 A.D.3d 1096, 933 N.Y.2d 594, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-orourke-nyappdiv-2011.