Thomas v. Orange Regional Medical Center
This text of 90 A.D.3d 479 (Thomas v. Orange Regional Medical Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendants’ moving papers were deficient since the addresses of the two proposed nonparty witnesses who would purportedly be inconvenienced by a trial in Bronx County were not provided. Nor was the nature and materiality of their anticipated testimony detailed (see Jacobs v Banks Shapiro Gettinger Waldinger & Brennan, LLP, 9 AD3d 299 [2004]; Nolan v Mount Vernon Hosp., 172 AD2d 368 [1991]).
We note however that, contrary to Supreme Court’s finding, defendant’s motion was not untimely. Concur — Gonzalez, EJ., Friedman, Moskowitz, Acosta and Richter, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
90 A.D.3d 479, 933 N.Y.2d 868, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-orange-regional-medical-center-nyappdiv-2011.