Thomas v. Orange County Government

Fourth Circuit

Thomas v. Orange County Government

583 F. App'x 45

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 2, 2014·No. No. 14-1353·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sharon Thomas appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the defendants upon finding Thomas’ claims barred by res judicata. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Thomas leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Thomas v. Orange Cnty. Gov’t, No. 1:10—cv-00078-CCE-LPA (M.D.N.C. Mar. 17, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sharon Thomas appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the defendants upon finding Thomas’ claims barred by res judicata. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Thomas leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Thomas v. Orange Cnty. Gov’t, No. 1:10—cv-00078-CCE-LPA (M.D.N.C. Mar. 17, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Thomas v. Orange County Government, 583 F. App'x 45 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

583 F. App'x 45 (Thomas v. Orange County Government) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.