Thomas v. Olshausen

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: December 11, 2008
• Docket: 08-1769
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1769

RANDY L. THOMAS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

YNEZ OLSHAUSEN; MARY ELLEN MCDONALD; PETER GORMAN; CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG POLICE; CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:07-cv-00130-GCM)

Submitted: November 10, 2008 Decided: December 11, 2008

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randy L. Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Weston Johnson, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina; Richard Harcourt Fulton, Sardar Mujeeb Shah-Khan, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina; Thomas J. Ziko, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Randy L. Thomas appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Thomas v. Olshausen, No. 3:07-cv-00130-GCM (W.D.N.C.

filed June 16, 2008 & entered June 17, 2008). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED