Thomas v. Olshausen

Fourth Circuit

Thomas v. Olshausen

305 F. App'x 55

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 11, 2008·No. No. 08-1769·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Randy L. Thomas appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Thomas v. Olshausen, No. 3:07-cv-00130-GCM, 2008 WL 2468738 (W.D.N.C. filed June 16, 2008) & (entered June 17, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Randy L. Thomas appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Thomas v. Olshausen, No. 3:07-cv-00130-GCM, 2008 WL 2468738 (W.D.N.C. filed June 16, 2008) & (entered June 17, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Thomas v. Olshausen, 305 F. App'x 55 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

305 F. App'x 55 (Thomas v. Olshausen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related