Thomas v. Moore

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Thomas v. Moore

816 So. 2d 1234, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7645, 2002 WL 1084961

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 31, 2002

DocketNo. 1D01-4157

StatusPublished

This text of 816 So. 2d 1234 (Thomas v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thomas v. Moore, 816 So. 2d 1234, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7645, 2002 WL 1084961 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of mandamus, Tommy Thomas seeks an order of this court compelling the circuit court to examine and make a determination of his pending habeas claim. We are satisfied that based on the actions taken by the circuit court since Thomas filed his petition with this court, our intervention through a writ of mandamus is both unnecessary and unwarranted. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

ALLEN, C.J., MINER and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of mandamus, Tommy Thomas seeks an order of this court compelling the circuit court to examine and make a determination of his pending habeas claim. We are satisfied that based on the actions taken by the circuit court since Thomas filed his petition with this court, our intervention through a writ of mandamus is both unnecessary and unwarranted. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

ALLEN, C.J., MINER and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

816 So. 2d 1234, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7645, 2002 WL 1084961, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-moore-fladistctapp-2002.