Thomas v. Monticello Vehicle Co.

73 S.E. 428, 10 Ga. App. 260, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 449
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 15, 1912·No. 3286·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

1. In a suit in a justice’s court on an account, where the judgment was in favor of the plaintiff, for principal and interest, it was not erroneous for the justice to enter a judgment for the amount of interest, as well as for the principal, due on the account, at 7 per cent, per annum from the date when the account became due; nor to enter judgment against the defendant for the costs, including the jury fee (paid by the plaintiff on reception of the verdict), when the ease was appealed to a jury in the justice’s court.

2. No error of law appears, and there is some slight evidence to support the verdict in the justice’s court; hence, the judgment of the superior court in overruling the certiorari must be Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomas v. Monticello Vehicle Co., 73 S.E. 428, 10 Ga. App. 260, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 449 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).

73 S.E. 428 (Thomas v. Monticello Vehicle Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Recordex Corp. v. Southeastern Metal Products, Inc.
248 S.E.2d 159 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1978)
Rice-Stix Dry Goods Co. v. Friedlander Bros.
117 S.E. 762 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)