Thomas v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

87 S.E. 303, 144 Ga. 367, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 204
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedDecember 15, 1915
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 87 S.E. 303 (Thomas v. Metropolitan Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomas v. Metropolitan Life Insurance, 87 S.E. 303, 144 Ga. 367, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 204 (Ga. 1915).

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

An insurance policy on the life of Mattie L. Bailey designated Janie Garlingtofi, the mother of the insured, as beneficiary. It contained, among others, the following provisions: (a). “If this policy be assigned or otherwise parted with, or if any erasure or alteration be made herein except by endorsement signed by the secretary, .' . this policy shall be void.” (6) “Subject to the approval of the company, the insured, at any time during the continuance of this policy, provided the policy be not then assigned, may change the beneficiary or beneficiaries, by written notice to the company at its home office, accompanied by this policy, such change to take effect on endorsement of the same on the policy by the company.” Held, that a petition in a suit on the policy by an alleged transferee for value, which failed to show assent to the transfer by endorsement on the policy signed by the secretary, or which, though alleging that the insured had signed a notice to the company of a substitution of the name of the alleged transferee for that of the beneficiary, failed to allege that such notice was presented to the company for endorsement before the death of. the insured, was subject to general demurrer.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bimestefer v. Bimestefer
109 A.2d 768 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2001)
Progressive Life Insurance v. Bohannon
40 S.E.2d 564 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1946)
Standard Discount Co. v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
53 N.E.2d 27 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1944)
McNeill v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
199 S.E. 442 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)
Krajewski v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
172 A. 396 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1934)
Tyler v. National Life & Accident Insurance
172 S.E. 747 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Hawkes v. Mobley
163 S.E. 494 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1932)
Barrett v. Barrett
160 S.E. 399 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1931)
Security Mutual Life Insurance v. Bankers Trust & Audit Co.
124 S.E. 53 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)
Farmers State Bank v. Kelley
118 S.E. 197 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1923)
Chance v. Simpkins
91 S.E. 773 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
87 S.E. 303, 144 Ga. 367, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-metropolitan-life-insurance-ga-1915.