Thomas v. Medical Employment Directory of St. Louis, L.L.C.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Thomas v. Medical Employment Directory of St. Louis, L.L.C.

511 S.W.3d 470, 2017 WL 770949

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 28, 2017·No. No. ED 104433·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lawanda Thomas (“Claimant”) appeals two decisions of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying her unemployment benefits. We find the Commission did not err in denying Claimant unemployment benefits.

[471] No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The decision of the Commission is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lawanda Thomas (“Claimant”) appeals two decisions of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying her unemployment benefits. We find the Commission did not err in denying Claimant unemployment benefits.

[471] No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The decision of the Commission is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Thomas v. Medical Employment Directory of St. Louis, L.L.C., 511 S.W.3d 470, 2017 WL 770949 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

511 S.W.3d 470 (Thomas v. Medical Employment Directory of St. Louis, L.L.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.