Thomas v. Meade County Bank

162 N.W. 536, 39 S.D. 8, 1917 S.D. LEXIS 80
CourtSouth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedMay 5, 1917
DocketFile No. 3998
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 162 N.W. 536 (Thomas v. Meade County Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomas v. Meade County Bank, 162 N.W. 536, 39 S.D. 8, 1917 S.D. LEXIS 80 (S.D. 1917).

Opinion

McCOY, J.

The opinion in this case will be found in 161 N. W. 325. On motion for rehearing the appellant contends that the original judgment appealed from unqualifiedly requires the public examiner to pay said judgment in full, irrespective of whether !or not there be other preferred claims or sufficient funds to pay any of said preferred claims in full. We are of the view-that the original judgment is deficient in this -particular, and the same may be modified by making the last paragraph thereof read as follows;

It is further ordered, adjudged, and decreed that said judgment is a preferred claim against the assets of the Meade County Bank of' Sturgis, and the defendant, J. L,. Wingfield, as public examiner of the state of South Dakota, or his successor in office, in charge of said Meade County Bank, is hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed to pay said judgment out of the assets of said bank before distributing said assets to> the general creditors! of said hank; but in the event there be not sufficient funds in the assets of said bank in the hands of said public examiner to -pay this and all other preferred claims in full, if any other preferred claims there he, then this preferred claim shall be paid pro rata with all preferred claims, and, in the event that this judgment be not satisfied in full as a preferred claim, then the balance thereof remaining shall be paid pro rata with general claims.

The opinion heretofore rendered is adhered to, but the original judgment is modified as above indicated, and. the motion for rehearing denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Beaver County v. Home Indemnity Co.
52 P.2d 435 (Utah Supreme Court, 1935)
Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. Johnson
43 P.2d 670 (Montana Supreme Court, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
162 N.W. 536, 39 S.D. 8, 1917 S.D. LEXIS 80, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-meade-county-bank-sd-1917.