Thomas v. McGrath

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Thomas v. McGrath

382 A.2d 1121, 75 N.J. 372, 1978 N.J. LEXIS 154

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedFebruary 15, 1978

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 382 A.2d 1121 (Thomas v. McGrath) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thomas v. McGrath, 382 A.2d 1121, 75 N.J. 372, 1978 N.J. LEXIS 154 (N.J. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is reversed substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Morgan's dissenting opinion which is reported at 145 N. J. Super. 288, 296.

Three members of the Court would affirm the judgment of the Appellate Division substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of that Court.

For reversal — Chief Justice Hughes and Justices Sullivan, Schreiber and Handler — 4.

For affirmance — Justices Pashman and Clifford and Judge Conford — 3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI