Thomas v. McGrath
382 A.2d 1121, 75 N.J. 372, 1978 N.J. LEXIS 154
Opinion
The judgment of the Appellate Division is reversed substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Morgan's dissenting opinion which is reported at 145 N. J. Super. 288, 296.
Three members of the Court would affirm the judgment of the Appellate Division substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of that Court.
For reversal — Chief Justice Hughes and Justices Sullivan, Schreiber and Handler — 4.
For affirmance — Justices Pashman and Clifford and Judge Conford — 3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thomas v. McGrath, 382 A.2d 1121, 75 N.J. 372, 1978 N.J. LEXIS 154 (N.J. 1978).
382 A.2d 1121 (Thomas v. McGrath) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
Winters v. Kiffmeyer
650 N.W.2d 167 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 2002)
Division of Elections of State v. Johnstone
669 P.2d 537 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1983)
In re Ruvoldt
453 A.2d 896 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1982)