Thomas v. Mat Power, Inc.

129 A.D.2d 697, 514 N.Y.S.2d 460, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45385

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Universal Reselite, Inc. appeals from an [698] order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Goldstein, J.), dated April 9, 1986, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to serve an amended bill of particulars.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the totality of the circumstances, it was not an abuse of discretion for the court to allow the plaintiffs to serve an amended bill of particulars. Although the plaintiffs significantly delayed in moving for leave to serve an amended bill of particulars, there was no real showing of prejudice to the defendant Universal Reselite, Inc. (see, Scarangello v State of New York, 111 AD2d 798). Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomas v. Mat Power, Inc., 129 A.D.2d 697, 514 N.Y.S.2d 460, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45385 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

129 A.D.2d 697 (Thomas v. Mat Power, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scarangello v. State
111 A.D.2d 798 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)