Thomas v. Martin
This text of 115 S.E. 71 (Thomas v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
W. L. Thomas filed a petition in the court of ordinary for a writ of habeas corpus against A. J. and Florence P. Martin, to obtain possession and custody of his minor son, John Ashley Thomas, four years of age. The defendants were the grandparents of the child. The mother of the child' died when he was ten days old, and the defendants, with the permission of the father, took possession of the child and eared for and reared him until the time of the trial. There was evidence of a written contract in regard to the custody of the child, and of the subsequent modification of the same. The evidence was conflicting. The ordinary rendered a judgment awarding the child to the grandparents. The father sued out a writ of certiorari to the superior court. After consideration of the case the judge of the superior court rendered a judgment denying the writ of certiorari. The plaintiff excepted. Held: It appearing that the judgment of the court of ordinary was rendered on conflicting evidence, and that the same was not an abuse of discretion, the judge of the superior court did not err in denying the writ of certiorari.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
115 S.E. 71, 154 Ga. 696, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-martin-ga-1922.