Thomas v. Martin

Fourth Circuit

Thomas v. Martin

231 F. App'x 279

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 29, 2007·No. No. 07-6424·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Alvon Allen Thomas appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Thomas v. Martin, No. 1:06-cv-00847WWD (M.D.N.C. filed Mar. 14, 2007; entered Mar. 15, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in [280]*280the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Alvon Allen Thomas appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Thomas v. Martin, No. 1:06-cv-00847WWD (M.D.N.C. filed Mar. 14, 2007; entered Mar. 15, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in [280]*280the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Thomas v. Martin, 231 F. App'x 279 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

231 F. App'x 279 (Thomas v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related