Thomas v. Marshall

44 F. App'x 277

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
• Decided: August 16, 2002
• Docket: No. 00-15312; D.C. No. CV-00-00142-TEH
• Status: Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

**

Keith Thomas, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing without leave to amend his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint alleging that officials at Pelican Bay State Prison violated his constitutional rights by reading his outgoing non-legal mail. We review de novo dismissals pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir.2000), and we affirm.

We conclude that the district court properly dismissed Thomas’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.