Thomas v. Lincoln Regional Center Staff Members
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
DYLAN THOMAS, 8:21CV368
Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM vs. AND ORDER
LINCOLN REGIONAL CENTER STAFF MEMBERS, ARTURO, from Homeland Security; and DR. NAJEEB,
Defendants.
This matter is before the court on Plaintiff’s Filing 18, in which he requests that no further filing fee installment payments be collected because he is currently confined at the Lincoln Regional Center after being “found not responsible by reasons of insanity and mental defects.” While Plaintiff is correct that an inmate in a state mental institution who has been committed after being found not guilty of a criminal charge by reason of insanity is not “prisoner” who is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act’s inmate-account procedures, see Kolocotronis v. Morgan, 247 F.3d 726 (8th Cir. 2001), the court is unable to confirm Plaintiff’s alleged status as a non-prisoner. The state’s online database (https://www.nebraska.gov/justice/case.cgi) indicates that criminal charges against Plaintiff remain pending in the District Court of Douglas County, Nebraska, in Case No. CR20-2652. Thus, Plaintiff will need to provide the court with satisfactory proof that he is no longer a prisoner before the collection of filing fee installment payments can be discontinued. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff’s motion to stop collection of fees (Filing 18) is denied without prejudice to refiling. 2. The clerk of the court is directed to update Plaintiff's address and to provide a copy of this Memorandum and Order to the appropriate official at the Lincoln Regional Center. Dated this 20th day of October, 2022. BY THE COURT: fichard G. Ax Richard G. “A Senior United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thomas v. Lincoln Regional Center Staff Members (Thomas v. Lincoln Regional Center Staff Members) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.