Thomas v. Keeney

306 Or. 433
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 17, 1988
DocketTC 86-C-11016; CA A41449; SC S33748
StatusPublished

This text of 306 Or. 433 (Thomas v. Keeney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomas v. Keeney, 306 Or. 433 (Or. 1988).

Opinion

ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO ENTER APPEALABLE JUDGMENT

Petitioner has appealed from a document that purports to be a judgment but does not comply with the requirements of ORCP 70. Rather than dismissing the appeal for lack of a judgment, the court determines that the statutory criteria of ORS 19.033(4) have been met and grants relief under that statute. See Ellis v. Roberts, 302 Or 6, 9-10, 725 P2d 886 (1986).

The court gives the trial court leave to enter an appealable judgment. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals.

If the trial court enters an appealable judgment, appellant may file an amended notice of appeal. Upon the filing of an amended notice of appeal, the Court of Appeals shall deem the appeal to have been taken from the new judgment. If appellant does not file timely an amended notice of appeal from the new judgment, the Court of Appeals may dismiss this appeal without further notice to the parties.

DATED this 17th day of August, 1988.

Berkeley Lent Presiding Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ellis v. Roberts
725 P.2d 886 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
306 Or. 433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-keeney-or-1988.