Thomas v. Kansas

205 U.S. 535, 27 S. Ct. 789
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 4, 1907
DocketNo. 478
StatusPublished

This text of 205 U.S. 535 (Thomas v. Kansas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomas v. Kansas, 205 U.S. 535, 27 S. Ct. 789 (1907).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Eilenbecker v. District Court of Plymouth County, 134 U. S. 31; Mugler v. Kansas, 123 U. S. 623; Crowley v. Christensen, 137 U. S. 86; Giozza v. Tiernan, 148 U. S. 662; Otis v. Parker, 187 U. S. 606, 608, 609; Castillo v. McConnico, 168 U. S. 674; Smiley v. Kansas, 196 U. S. 447. Case below, 86 Pac. Rep. 499.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mugler v. Kansas
123 U.S. 623 (Supreme Court, 1887)
Eilenbecker v. District Court of Plymouth County
134 U.S. 31 (Supreme Court, 1890)
Crowley v. Christensen
137 U.S. 86 (Supreme Court, 1890)
Castillo v. McConnico
168 U.S. 674 (Supreme Court, 1898)
Otis v. Parker
187 U.S. 606 (Supreme Court, 1903)
Smiley v. Kansas
196 U.S. 447 (Supreme Court, 1905)
Giozza v. Tiernan
148 U.S. 657 (Supreme Court, 1893)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
205 U.S. 535, 27 S. Ct. 789, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-kansas-scotus-1907.