Thomas v. Kaback Enterprises, Inc.

265 A.D.2d 246, 696 N.Y.S.2d 818, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10871

This text of 265 A.D.2d 246 (Thomas v. Kaback Enterprises, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomas v. Kaback Enterprises, Inc., 265 A.D.2d 246, 696 N.Y.S.2d 818, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10871 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth Thompson, Jr., J.), [247]*247entered January 25, 1999, which, upon the grant of plaintiffs’ motion for reargument and renewal, denied defendants’ previously granted motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Under the circumstances here present, defendant failed to establish as a matter of law that its van was not involved in the hit-and-run accident. Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Rosenberger, Williams, Wallach and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
265 A.D.2d 246, 696 N.Y.S.2d 818, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10871, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-kaback-enterprises-inc-nyappdiv-1999.