Thomas v. Justices of the Supreme Court

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Thomas v. Justices of the Supreme Court

304 A.D.2d 585, 756 N.Y.S.2d 909, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3637

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 7, 2003·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition, inter alia, to preclude the respondent Honorable Roger N. Rosengarten from retrying the petitioners in a criminal action entitled People v Anthony Thomas and Thomas Boone, pending in the Supreme Court, Queens County, under Indictment No. 951/01.

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

[586]*586The petitioners failed to join and serve a necessary party, the District Attorney of Queens County (see CPLR 7804 [i]). Feuerstein, J.P., Smith, H. Miller and Townes, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition, inter alia, to preclude the respondent Honorable Roger N. Rosengarten from retrying the petitioners in a criminal action entitled People v Anthony Thomas and Thomas Boone, pending in the Supreme Court, Queens County, under Indictment No. 951/01.

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

[586]*586The petitioners failed to join and serve a necessary party, the District Attorney of Queens County (see CPLR 7804 [i]). Feuerstein, J.P., Smith, H. Miller and Townes, JJ., concur.

Thomas v. Justices of the Supreme Court, 304 A.D.2d 585, 756 N.Y.S.2d 909, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3637 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

304 A.D.2d 585 (Thomas v. Justices of the Supreme Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related