Thomas v. Jamaica Buses, Inc.
This text of 5 A.D.2d 843 (Thomas v. Jamaica Buses, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover a balance due under a construction contract, the appeal is from an order directing appellants to consummate a settlement agreement. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Wenzel, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur; Nolan, P. J., dissents and votes to reverse the order and to deny the motion, with the following memorandum: If it be assumed that a superseding agreement or an execu-tory accord may be enforced by motion, the record presented does not establish any such agreement or accord which is enforeible against appellants. (Cf. Atterbury v. Walsh Paper Corp., 261 App. Div. 529, affd. 286 N. Y. 578.) Nor is there any stipulation between the parties for the entry of judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 A.D.2d 843, 170 N.Y.S.2d 852, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6999, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-jamaica-buses-inc-nyappdiv-1958.