Thomas v. Jacobs

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Thomas v. Jacobs

98 A. 863, 254 Pa. 255, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 715

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 23, 1916·No. Appeal, No. 144·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The court below found that if the gasoline tank which the appellee intends to erect shall be equipped and maintained as he proposes to equip and maintain it, the storage of gasoline in it, and the withdrawal and sale of the same therefrom, will not be unduly dangerous to life or property, and will not constitute a nuisance. On this finding the appeal is dismissed- at appellant’s costs,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The court below found that if the gasoline tank which the appellee intends to erect shall be equipped and maintained as he proposes to equip and maintain it, the storage of gasoline in it, and the withdrawal and sale of the same therefrom, will not be unduly dangerous to life or property, and will not constitute a nuisance. On this finding the appeal is dismissed- at appellant’s costs,

Thomas v. Jacobs, 98 A. 863, 254 Pa. 255, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 715 (Pa. 1916).

Pincite

98 A. 863 (Thomas v. Jacobs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related