Thomas v. Huebsch
459 So. 2d 1182, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2594, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16465
This text of 459 So. 2d 1182 (Thomas v. Huebsch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Thomas v. Huebsch, 459 So. 2d 1182, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2594, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16465 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).
Opinion
Finding no merit in the appellants’ position, we affirm the Final Judgment of Re-cission entered by the trial court. With regard to the award of attorney’s fees, however, we reverse. Leitman v. Boone, 439 So.2d 318 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Leitman v. Boone
439 So. 2d 318 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
459 So. 2d 1182, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2594, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16465, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-huebsch-fladistctapp-1984.