Thomas v. Henderson
1915 OK 207, 149 P. 839, 46 Okla. 690, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 1236
Opinion
The petition in error and the transcript of the record in this case was filed in this court on September 28, 1912. Neither parey has filed a brief, nor have they offered any excuse for the failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned.
The judgment of the trial court should therefore be affirmed, under rule 7 of this court (38 Okla, vi, 137 Pac. ix). Nicholson v. Barnes, 42 Okla. 250, 140 Pac. 1155.
By the Court: It is so -ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thomas v. Henderson, 1915 OK 207, 149 P. 839, 46 Okla. 690, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 1236 (Okla. 1915).
1915 OK 207 (Thomas v. Henderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Simmons v. State
1915 OK 1073 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1915)