Thomas v. Hawkins
This text of 234 A.D. 715 (Thomas v. Hawkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Order reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. The representative of the decedent’s estate is a necessary party to this action. (Potter v. Ellice, 48 N. Y. 321.) The original representative having died, the new administrator should be substituted in her place as a defendant. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
234 A.D. 715, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-hawkins-nyappdiv-1931.