Thomas v. Hawkins

715 N.W.2d 872, 475 Mich. 890

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Thomas v. Hawkins. Read the opinion of the Court — 474 Mich. 1101 →

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided June 26, 2006·No. 130108·Published

Opinion

715 N.W.2d 872 (2006) 475 Mich. 890

Antonio L. THOMAS and Antonio L. Thomas Associated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
La-Van HAWKINS and Urban City Foods, LLC, Defendants-Appellees, and
Melvin Butch Hollowell, Receiver-Appellee.

Docket No. 130108. COA No. 266779.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

June 26, 2006.

*873 On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's order of March 31, 2006 is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

715 N.W.2d 872 (2006) 475 Mich. 890

Antonio L. THOMAS and Antonio L. Thomas Associated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
La-Van HAWKINS and Urban City Foods, LLC, Defendants-Appellees, and
Melvin Butch Hollowell, Receiver-Appellee.

Docket No. 130108. COA No. 266779.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

June 26, 2006.

*873 On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's order of March 31, 2006 is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

Thomas v. Hawkins, 715 N.W.2d 872, 475 Mich. 890 (Mich. 2006).

Pincite

715 N.W.2d 872 (Thomas v. Hawkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Antonio L. THOMAS and Antonio L. Thomas Associated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. La-Van HAWKINS and Urban City Foods, LLC, Defendants-Appellees, and Melvin Butch Hollowell, Receiver-Appellee.

Antonio L. THOMAS and Antonio L. Thomas Associated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
La-Van HAWKINS and Urban City Foods, LLC, Defendants-Appellees, and
Melvin Butch Hollowell, Receiver-Appellee.